← Search

Christy Brant

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 75W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christy Brant to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-09-03 · PH YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Silliman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-27 · PH YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Silliman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-20 · PH YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nhung Van
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Virginia Foster / Marcia Whitney
2026-08-05 · ATC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheri Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · ATC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobbie Brandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Shelby Striegel / Michelle Davis
2026-07-17 · PH RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Quigley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · ATC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlotte Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-03 · PH RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Silliman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-01 · ATC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlotte Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-25 · PH RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nhung Van
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · PH RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Quigley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-12 · PH GREEN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amber McGregor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
54.5%
36W–30L · 50.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.2% of games
7.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 59.6% of games
8.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.2% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova