← Search

Beth Barnes

Troy, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 37W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Barnes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-08-06 · BTF Tavernit SL A65-8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Tavernit
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · TROY-Dunn 55s 8.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Tavernit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · BTF Tavernit SL A65-8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Tavernit
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · BT-Barlow 40s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rise Gilliland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-29 · TROY-Dunn 55s 8.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Tavernit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · TROY-Dunn 55s 8.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Livingston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · BT-Barlow 40s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Tavernit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · BT-Barlow 40s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Tavernit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · TROY-Dunn 55s 8.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Coyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-03 · LT-Myrick 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Basilico
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · LT-Szymanski 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Tavernit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-07-09 · 7LIFE-MYRICK 40DW WE 40&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Tavernit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 51.3% of games
4.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 41.4% of games
8.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 61.9% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal