← Search

Ana Trsic

Macomb, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 72W–108L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ana Trsic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
L
2026-08-31 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Fitch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Wheatley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Fitch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-17 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with JUSTIN WHITE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-12 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Fitch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Nicholas Ludwig / Jessica Perry
2026-08-04 · PEACH-DeGuzman 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Al Itchon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · PEACH-Mazur 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Fitch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · PEACH-DeGuzman 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · PEACH-DeGuzman 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaclyn Nasir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · PEACH-DeGuzman 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaclyn Nasir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-30 · PEACH-DeGuzman 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Al Itchon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-05-26 · PEACH-DeGuzman 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 60.2% of games
4.0
15.7%
8W–43L · 40.1% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.5% of games
7.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.9% of games
7.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 48.9% of games
8.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 44% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 29.8% of games
7.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.4% of games
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 24% of the time
#1 Singles
24%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
32 matches
#2 Singles
15%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
27 matches
#3 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe