← Search

Jeffrey Schlak

Wadsworth, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 81W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Schlak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-06-30 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-23 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · A18 4.0M 1 PM Sours · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keir Thelander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-28 · A18 4.0M 1 PM Sours · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-26 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-19 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-12 · A40 4.0M PM2 Schlak · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-13 · A18 4.0M PM Harmon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-02-27 · A18 4.0M PM Harmon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
74.4%
61W–21L · 60.9% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 48.3% of games
8.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.9% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.6% of games
8.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams