← Search

Dan Ritchey

Marshallville, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 69W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dan Ritchey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
L
2026-07-14 · A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-02 · A18 4.0M 1 PM Sours · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glen Andrianov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Kabak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Brian Padden / Robert Moore
2026-06-02 · A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-26 · A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-19 · A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Renz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-14 · A18 4.0M 1 PM Sours · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Liebermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-12 · A40 4.0M PM1 Harmon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
71%
22W–9L · 57.3% of games
4.0
47.2%
25W–28L · 48.2% of games
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 62% of games
7.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
18 matches
#1 Singles
11%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams