← Search

Debbie Hack

West Bloomfield, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
241 matches · 146W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debbie Hack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history241 matches
W
2026-08-03 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jocelyn Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-20 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-01 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Watsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcia Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-04 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madoka Minamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-21 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geri Bulka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-20 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joelle Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · SCWB-Hack 40 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #3 Singles · 8.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-2
W
Susan Scott
2025-12-06 · 4SCWB- Chan 40 WOMEN fall SINGLES F1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
68.4%
78W–36L · 58.4% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 55.2% of games
8.0
63.8%
37W–21L · 57.7% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 34.3% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
55 matches
#1 Singles
22%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
36 matches
#2 Singles
9%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova