← Search

Pamela Watsky

Commerce Township, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 37W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pamela Watsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-07-13 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sabine Froehlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-29 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Hack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Lankowsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-08 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with M Elise Guidos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2025-08-04 · 3SCWB-HACK 80DW MO 55&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Lankowsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Kitte Currier / Amy Stackhouse
2025-07-28 · 3SCWB-HACK 80DW MO 55&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Hack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-07-02 · 3SCWB-HACK 80NW WE 55&O SEM · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Hack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-18 · 3SCWB-HACK 80NW WE 55&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcia Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-04 · 3SCWB-HACK 80NW WE 55&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with M Elise Guidos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Judy Siegel / Pauline Unfried
2024-09-14 · #3 Doubles · with Susan Lesson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-09-07 · #1 Doubles · with M Elise Guidos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-09-06 · #1 Doubles · with M Elise Guidos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
50%
8W–8L · 52.6% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 70% of games
8.0
57.6%
19W–14L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer