← Search

Paul Whipple

Centennial, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
245 matches · 177W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Paul Whipple to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history245 matches
W
Nate Dessert / Brian Joos
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Whipple championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
Andre Williams / James Russell
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Thomas Carson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Whipple championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · SS-H BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff Cline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Martin Krbec / Chris Lawson - *
2026-07-11 · PCRK RED · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeff Cline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Gary Civitella championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · SS-H BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Jacob
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-02 · SS-H BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Paschal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · DTP RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Sones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · DTP RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Whipple mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · SS-H BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christian Thurstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · Colorado/Jacob/MX40&Over9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Bracken mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.5
76.6%
59W–18L · 60% of games
5.0
0%
0W–5L · 29.9% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.7% of games
8.0mixed
91.7%
33W–3L · 66.3% of games
8.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.5% of games
9.0mixed
72.2%
26W–10L · 60.6% of games
9.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
63 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams