← Search

Mark Lindstrom

— year-end
100 matches · 43W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Lindstrom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-08-27 · EM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Benjamin Kuruvila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · EM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kent Redding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-20 · EM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lance Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kent Redding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-23 · EM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Ericson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · EM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bill Speck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · EM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Haynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · EM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bill Speck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-02 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grant Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · EM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grant Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · EM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Haynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kent Redding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
52.5%
21W–19L · 51.4% of games
4.5
36.2%
17W–30L · 43.2% of games
8.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer