← Search

David Sam

Bentonville, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 37W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add David Sam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
Ian Mcvinney / Blake Cunningham
2026-09-13 · Hui-Page/Bentonville/MP · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Edmund Hui
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-09-12 · Hui-Page/Bentonville/MP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackson Arbeitman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Jason Sykes / Brian Allen
2026-09-12 · Hui-Page/Bentonville/MP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Spencer Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlee Brewer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
April Hultquist / Jackson Arbeitman
2026-07-19 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gracie Gentry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Temple mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlee Brewer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Coppick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-18 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi May mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Hoffmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · Buescher-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Akins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-08 · Buescher-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
91.7%
22W–2L · 63.7% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 62.1% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.2% of games
4.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert