← Search

Heidi May

Elm Springs, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 29W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Heidi May to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-07-11 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Meek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tihomir Buncic mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harrison Heien mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Sam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Jeter/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tihomir Buncic mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
Margo Hafner / Ruth Owens
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Cecilia Raymond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Nancy Ho / Jacqueline Shearman
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · with Cecilia Raymond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Leslie King-Gillispie / Devona Shelton
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · with Cecilia Raymond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-07 · Hoffmann/BV/MRC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Jeter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pleshette Benford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-01 · Raymond-Wilson/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pleshette Benford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 30% of games
7.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 59.6% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams