← Search

Thomas Verdi

— year-end
158 matches · 67W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Thomas Verdi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
W
2026-06-18 · Cook, Brad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Steven Lesko / Gregg Hanson
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · with Roy Allen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · HOA/Schwabauer/55&over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · Cook, Brad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Kimbrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Cook, Brad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Kimbrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-01 · Cook, Brad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trevor Holsinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · HOA/Schwabauer/55&over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Lair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-5
W
2026-05-21 · Cook, Brad · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-07 · Cook, Brad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Schwabauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · HOA/Schwabauer/55&over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Lair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-30 · Cook, Brad · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-23 · Cook, Brad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Lair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
60.6%
20W–13L · 54.4% of games
4.5
38.6%
22W–35L · 45.1% of games
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 60.7% of games
9.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 44.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.2% of games
9.0mixed
28.6%
8W–20L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
32 matches
#1 Singles
20%
31 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams