← Search

Brad Cook

Overland Park, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 40W–43L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Brad Cook to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Nagy, Kyle · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Sanford, Carson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Henn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · Nagy, Kyle · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Pena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
Ram Gottapu / Joseph Bui
2026-08-03 · Nagy, Kyle · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-31 · Murphy, Susan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracey Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · Sanford, Carson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Henn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-4
L
2026-07-16 · Nagy, Kyle · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Oswaldo Bravo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · Murphy, Susan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vanessa Watkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-19 · Murphy, Susan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracey Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-18 · Cook, Brad · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Verdi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · Murphy, Susan · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Wasman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
RAGHURAMAN RAMASUBBU / Ellis von Fintel
2026-06-11 · Cook, Brad · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Schwabauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 47.5% of games
3.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 65.1% of games
4.0
47.4%
18W–20L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
19 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer