← Search

Anne Brandt

Manlius, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 94W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anne Brandt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Bates/nardella · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Matt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · Bates/nardella · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Nardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marla Share
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-29 · Bates/nardella · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Nardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Bates/nardella · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Nardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Syracuse: Simpson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alysia Schmaltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-17 · Bates/nardella · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Matt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-14 · Syracuse: Geary/ Nelligan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Brandt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · Syracuse: Geary/ Nelligan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Brandt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-28 · Syracuse: Simpson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Grossman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · with Steve Brandt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-29 · Syracuse: Simpson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hawthorne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
54.4%
43W–36L · 52.9% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.6% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
53.2%
25W–22L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal