← Search

Kris Chan

Liverpool, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 59W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kris Chan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Meade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Sikora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Chan - Krueger · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with McKenna Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johanna Kmetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · Radoff · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · Syracuse: Get a Grip · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · Chan - Krueger · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · Chan - Krueger · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · Radoff · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · Syracuse: Get a Grip · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · Chan - Krueger · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
51.6%
16W–15L · 53.1% of games
4.0
33.9%
38W–74L · 44.3% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 28% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
50 matches
#1 Singles
28%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
15 matches
#2 Singles
9%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams