← Search

Richard Dickerson

— year-end
86 matches · 27W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Richard Dickerson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
Wayne Bowman / Martina Augsburger
2026-09-10 · Bostick · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Briana Bostick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
Shashi Pathak / Wayne Bowman
2026-08-27 · Bostick · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adria Concannon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-20 · Bostick · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Kammann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-13 · Bostick · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renea Harbert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · Masters of Swing (Dickerson) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Uy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · Masters of Swing (Dickerson) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Elverhoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-16 · Masters of Swing (Dickerson) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yuniesky Quesada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-09 · Masters of Swing (Dickerson) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Wonsidler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · Dickerson/Nash (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Sindecuse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-12 · Dickerson/Nash (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Westphal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-11 · Boone · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Dannevik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
George Hendrix / Kevin Brown
2026-02-25 · Boone · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Schless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
32.2%
19W–40L · 43.5% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.3% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 29.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
15 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer