← Search

William Dannevik

— year-end
270 matches · 93W–177L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add William Dannevik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Quick Draw McGraw (Shouldis) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Brower-Kitchens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-6
L
2026-08-16 · Quick Draw McGraw (Shouldis) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-08 · Release the Quacken (Shouldis) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bekah Lovsness mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · Release the Quacken (Shouldis) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristy Reams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Release the Quacken (Shouldis) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristy Reams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-18 · Release the Quacken (Shouldis) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chantal Mehill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · Quick Draw McGraw (Shouldis) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martina Augsburger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Release the Quacken (Shouldis) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Parmentier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-26 · Rhoads/Full Metal Racquets (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Salter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-24 · Rhoads/Full Metal Racquets (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-12 · Rhoads/Full Metal Racquets (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · Rhoads/Full Metal Racquets (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams58 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
39.2%
31W–48L · 46.6% of games
4.0
20.5%
15W–58L · 36.8% of games
7.0
51.4%
19W–18L · 50.4% of games
8.0
25%
5W–15L · 43.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
19W–19L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
17.4%
4W–19L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
53 matches
#2 Singles
12%
32 matches
#1 Singles
8%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams