← Search

Tom Brink

Mountville, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
393 matches · 249W–144L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tom Brink to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history393 matches
W
2026-08-11 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Belser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Koons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-02 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Kintner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · RCW - Campbell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dave Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-22 · RCW - Campbell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andy Loose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-20 · (CPD) York College - Hack · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Niko Mucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-07 · (CPD) York College - Hack · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Keffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Kristine Criswell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · with Trisha Pearson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Pamela Kane / Ray Anderson
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · with Trisha Pearson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
71.3%
62W–25L · 56.9% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
80%
8W–2L · 58.9% of games
9.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.2% of games
8.0mixed
78.5%
84W–23L · 60.1% of games
9.0mixed
65.9%
29W–15L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
215 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
119 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
56 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova