← Search

Bernard Ilkhanoff

Lititz, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 26W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bernard Ilkhanoff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-08-19 · RCW - Sumar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Trach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-4
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Mark Trach championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-07-26 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Glatsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Trach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Trach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Trach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Glatsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · (CPD) RCW - Sumar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregg Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · RCW - Sumar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregg Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-11-22 · RCW Loose · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Staman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-01 · RCW Loose · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-10-24 · RCW Loose · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hugo VanderGoes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 47.6% of games
4.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 57.7% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.1% of games
8.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.7% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 57% of the time
#2 Doubles
57%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams