← Search

Lisa Newhouse

— year-end
35 matches · 18W–17L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Lisa Newhouse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2025-05-18 · Team Fedder/Newhouse · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-05-17 · Team Fedder/Newhouse · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catharina Jansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-02-22 · Team Fedder/Newhouse · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy MacKay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-22 · Team Fedder/Newhouse · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Fedder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-05 · Newhouse/Fedder · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chloe Seymour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-05 · Newhouse/Fedder · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-04-14 · Newhouse/Fedder · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-04-14 · Newhouse/Fedder · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-04-13 · Newhouse/Fedder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Schubert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-02-10 · Guthrie Rindfusz · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2024-02-10 · Guthrie Rindfusz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Blackman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-04-30 · Fedder/Newhouse · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams9 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 55% of games
4.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.1% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova