← Search

Anant Singh

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 57W–81L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Anant Singh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-09-06 · ACAC Jones/Kasten Weekend · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Will Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-05 · ACAC Carter 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-29 · ACAC Jones/Kasten Weekend · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Peter Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-16 · ACAC McFadden · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Bucheit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · ACAC Carter 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paul Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-15 · ACAC Jones/Kasten Weekend · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Peter Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-12 · ACAC McFadden · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Bucheit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-06 · ACAC Volley Llamas - Jones · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Townsend mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · ACAC Carter 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Waiman Law
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · ACAC McFadden · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · ACAC McFadden · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Bucheit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · ACAC - Cipolla · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randolph Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 53.5% of games
4.0
25%
3W–9L · 36.5% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
12W–8L · 52.9% of games
7.5
25%
3W–9L · 42.2% of games
8.0
25%
2W–6L · 43.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
12W–12L · 48.3% of games
7.5mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 44.5% of games
8.0mixed
23.5%
4W–13L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova