← Search

Beth Stinson

Manakin Sabot, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 38W–25L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Beth Stinson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-09-09 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-09-02 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Royster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · Hermitage Stinson/Orski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Royster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-24 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-21 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Royster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-19 · Hermitage Stinson/Orski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren McKetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · HCC Frazier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ted Luse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-12 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · HCC Frazier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neal Kauder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · Hermitage Stinson/Orski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with ANJA BAUGH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · Hermitage Stinson/Orski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-23 · HCC Frazier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Hoffler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 60.5% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 47.9% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.3% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 51.1% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal