← Search

Silvia Amat

— year-end
149 matches · 64W–85L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Silvia Amat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dalmau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Jose Jorquera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-4
W
2026-02-14 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paola Jaime
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-06 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Jane Raine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-26 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mira Hashe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-23 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paola Jaime
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-12-15 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mira Hashe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-09 · Ron Ehmann Park (Reyes) · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Jose Jorquera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-02 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mira Hashe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-24 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Lampe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Jose Jorquera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-17 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alejandra Siller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
43.8%
60W–77L · 48.6% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.3% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.2% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
28 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
15 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams