← Search

Gema de Dios

Doral, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
502 matches · 297W–205L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Gema de Dios to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history502 matches
L
2026-09-09 · deDios (Dante Fascell) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Salcedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Maria Brozzi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Claudia Plata championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Gabriela Rexach championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-11 · Broward/Montoto · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Montoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-09 · Broward/Montoto · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veronica Wank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Paola Jaime championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-28 · Broward/Montoto · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sahar Moghaddam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-28 · Broward/Montoto · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Montoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-27 · deDios (Dante Fascell) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Salcedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-23 · Broward/Montoto · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Brozzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 36.8% of games
3.5
71.6%
154W–61L · 58.1% of games
4.0
40.5%
47W–69L · 47.3% of games
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.6% of games
7.5
54.5%
30W–25L · 51.9% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
76.5%
26W–8L · 59.7% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
199 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
151 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
130 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
15 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova