← Search

Maureen Rasp-Glose

— year-end
94 matches · 42W–52L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Maureen Rasp-Glose to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
L
2026-01-23 · Palm Aire Seider · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hong Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-22 · Palm Aire Seider · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Constance Duncan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · BUF: Go Buffalo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Pasier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-25 · BUF: Go Buffalo · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Audrey Cohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-10-12 · BUF: Go Buffalo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Pasier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-10-03 · BUF: Go Buffalo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audrey Cohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-25 · Plantation Wise Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Dipierro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-03-15 · Plantation Chandler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-03-13 · Payne Park Seider · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lenore Funes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-08 · Plantation Chandler · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-03-01 · Plantation Petruccelli · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-20 · Payne Park Seider · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn Deuitch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 42.4% of games
4.0
90%
9W–1L · 63.6% of games
4.5
36.2%
17W–30L · 45.1% of games
8.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 50.1% of games
9.0
25%
2W–6L · 35% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
24 matches
#1 Singles
22%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert