← Search

Elisabeth Dexter

Amherst, NY
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 41W–18L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elisabeth Dexter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-03-08 · Jaguars · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darren Stohr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-08 · Jaguars · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darren Stohr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · Jaguars · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darren Stohr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-11-23 · Simply Smashing Gold · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Missy Fitzharris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · Simply Smashing Gold · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rowena de Perio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-18 · Western: Wilbon/Banks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Turhan Wilbon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-11 · BUF: Banks/Wilbon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Ahrens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-07-28 · BUF: Banks/Wilbon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Ahrens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-24 · Western: Wilbon/Banks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carl DiNatale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-07-17 · Servivors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Early
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-12 · Servivors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joyce Monczynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-07-06 · Western: Olympus · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Hutschenreuter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 61.2% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.9% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova