← Search

Betsy Wenger

— year-end
77 matches · 39W–38L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Betsy Wenger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
N/A
2023-02-24 · Hempfield - Scott · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Yeagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-02-10 · Hempfield - Scott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Yeagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-01-25 · Hempfield - Scott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Yeagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2022-12-09 · Hempfield - Scott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Phyllis Bouder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2022-12-02 · Hempfield - Scott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Yeagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6
L
2022-11-18 · Hempfield - Scott · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Yeagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2022-10-21 · Hempfield - Scott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Yeagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-07-05 · Hempfield - Wenger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Phyllis Bouder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-06-23 · Hempfield - Wenger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Aierstuck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2022-05-25 · Hempfield - Wenger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Yeagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-11 · Hempfield - Wenger · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Yeagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2022-05-04 · Hempfield - Wenger · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Yeagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Teams9 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 41% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
8.0
44%
11W–14L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams