← Search

Cathy Tobin

Lititz, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 92W–129L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cathy Tobin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history221 matches
W
2026-08-13 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · Hempfield - Campbell Tait · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JoAnne Hangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
Susan Seeley
2026-07-28 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Hempfield - Campbell Tait · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Grosteffon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · Hempfield - Campbell Tait · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bobbie Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · YACTA - Greenholt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Siefken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · YACTA - Greenholt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Bream
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-23 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lore Rigano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 56.3% of games
4.0
50%
22W–22L · 46% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
15W–10L · 51.7% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 76.4% of games
8.0
38.5%
15W–24L · 47.4% of games
7.0mixed
29%
9W–22L · 43.4% of games
8.0mixed
21.2%
11W–41L · 39.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
42 matches
#1 Singles
18%
39 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe