← Search

Laura Motis

— year-end
25 matches · 10W–15L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Laura Motis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-05-27 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geraldine Tardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-20 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terree Meyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-06 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Worrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-15 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-08 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-01-30 · Winter Haven - J. Platania · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Platania
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-16 · Winter Haven - J. Platania · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Ramka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-03-08 · Plant City Smashers - P. Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-27 · Polk/Brakefield/18&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan McGill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-13 · Polk/Brakefield/18&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meagan McGill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-30 · Polk/Brakefield/18&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan McGill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2024-01-26 · Plant City Smashers - P. Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 48.1% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.8% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 30.1% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 32.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 20% of the time
#1 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#3 Female Doubles
20%
5 matches
#4 Female Doubles
20%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe