← Search

Geri Burke

Tampa, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
337 matches · 216W–121L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Geri Burke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history337 matches
L
2026-02-27 · HILLS/Adult65&over7.0W/ E. Vickers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Flynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
W
2026-02-12 · Arbor Greene LOVAs - G. Burke · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-07 · AG LOCAs - G. Burke · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Silvia Srour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-06 · HILLS/Adult65&over7.0W/ E. Vickers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erin Vickers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-02-05 · Arbor Greene LOVAs - G. Burke · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-5
W
2026-01-31 · AG LOCAs - G. Burke · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-01-30 · HILLS/Adult65&over7.0W/ E. Vickers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Kensrue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · AG LOCAs - G. Burke · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-01-23 · HILLS/Adult65&over7.0W/ E. Vickers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Coston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-01-22 · Arbor Greene LOVAs - G. Burke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Whitten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-16 · HILLS/Adult65&over7.0W/ E. Vickers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erin Vickers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · with Julie Center championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
65.7%
115W–60L · 58.3% of games
4.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 56.1% of games
6.5
69.6%
16W–7L · 60% of games
7.0
80%
36W–9L · 62.7% of games
7.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
118 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
111 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
93 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova