← Search

Pamela Sweet

— year-end
31 matches · 11W–20L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Pamela Sweet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2025-06-24 · BRTC:Bass River:Arkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Blitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-5
W
2025-06-17 · BRTC:Bass River:Arkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Dick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-27 · BRTC:Bass River:Arkins · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Guy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-07-11 · MAC:Manchester:Muzio/Frick · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diana Blitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-10 · BRTC:Bass River:Sweet · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Deborah Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-26 · BRTC:Bass River:Sweet · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Irving
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-13 · MAC:Manchester:Muzio/Frick · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Frick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-05 · BRTC:Bass River:Sweet · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anne Kirby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-05-30 · MAC:Manchester:Muzio/Frick · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nancy Nevils
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2024-04-14 · Apex:Holmes:Finneral · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Bulkley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-04-14 · Apex:Holmes:Finneral · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Bulkley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-28 · BRTC:Bass River:Sweet · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Hoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Teams10 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 33.8% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
40%
8W–12L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova