← Search

Lisa Finneral

— year-end
411 matches · 259W–152L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Finneral to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history411 matches
W
2026-07-28 · NEW:Pinch an Inch:Bloom · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Una Nimhurchu-Dennehy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · SC:Federico:Holmes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barbara Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · NEW:Newburyport:Bailey/Finneral · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barbara Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · SC:Federico:Holmes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · Apex:Macdonald/Holmes · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kristine Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · Apex:Macdonald/Holmes · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kristine Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-1
L
2026-07-09 · NEW:Newburyport:Bailey/Finneral · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leah Sommer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · NEW:Newburyport:Bailey/Finneral · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barbara Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-25 · NEW:Newburyport:Bailey/Finneral · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nancy Nevils
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-6
W
2026-06-20 · Apex:Macdonald/Holmes · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lori Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · NEW:Newburyport:Bailey/Finneral · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · NEW:Pinch an Inch:Bloom · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victoria Kilroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
Teams90 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
76%
38W–12L · 63.1% of games
4.0
66.9%
93W–46L · 56.8% of games
4.5
48.4%
45W–48L · 49.1% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.9% of games
8.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 57.5% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
55.8%
24W–19L · 52.7% of games
9.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
212 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
66 matches
#1 Singles
11%
43 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer