← Search

Nancy Freas

West Chester, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 78W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Freas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
W
2026-07-21 · Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Gaffney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · DuPont Gold · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane M Stoutland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-08 · Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Beach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Anne Brooking / Maryann Platz
2025-08-21 · #3 Doubles · with Barbara Dehaven championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Strang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roberta Dimond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Bev Michel / Susan Miller
2025-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Louise Callahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Gaffney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Zecca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle McCreary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-14 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Herzlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
75%
6W–2L · 65.9% of games
3.5
44.8%
30W–37L · 49.2% of games
7.0
60.4%
32W–21L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
41 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer