← Search

Barbara Dehaven

Wilmington, DE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 54W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barbara Dehaven to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Senior Smash · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Grim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-04 · Senior Smash · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · Acing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Gaffney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Senior Smash · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patti Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-28 · Acing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Longacre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · Mid-Court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Rudnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Zecca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · Acing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Longacre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Mid-Court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Rudnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · Slice Slice Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · After Smash · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 56.7% of games
4.0
30.8%
16W–36L · 41.3% of games
7.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 48% of games
8.0
13.8%
9W–56L · 34.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
47 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer