← Search

Nikki Elam

— year-end
65 matches · 47W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Nikki Elam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Jones, Libby · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robbie Ellard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · Jones, Libby · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · Sing, Stephanie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leisa McCool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-22 · Sing, Stephanie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leisa McCool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-08 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Fiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-09-22 · Do, Jennifer · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mandy Castle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-08-27 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Fiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-08-19 · Sing, Stephanie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leisa McCool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-08-18 · Do, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-08-13 · Rector, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Fiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-22 · Sing, Stephanie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leisa McCool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-06-24 · Sing, Stephanie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leisa McCool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 59.5% of games
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.1% of games
4.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 56.8% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 65.6% of games
7.5
70%
14W–6L · 55.2% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#1 Singles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer