← Search

Carla Rushing

Flowood, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 41W–46L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Carla Rushing to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Adams, Amber · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Stroud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-01 · Adams, Amber · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Pool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · Adams, Amber · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christine Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Adams, Amber · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Pool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-05 · Trigg, Anita · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · Trigg, Anita · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Gore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-03-19 · Trigg, Anita · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-02 · Viljoen, Emillia · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Presnall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-26 · Trigg, Anita · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah McGehee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-16 · Viljoen, Emillia · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Presnall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-12 · Trigg, Anita · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-09 · Viljoen, Emillia · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Presnall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
82.4%
28W–6L · 64.7% of games
4.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 36.1% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
25%
4W–12L · 47.4% of games
3.5mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 39.6% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 27.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe