← Search

Debora Bork

Cleveland, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 76W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debora Bork to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
L
2026-07-13 · A40 3.0W CV1 Poe · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Herbener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · NEO/Lockert/A65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen O'Hearn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · A40 3.0W CV1 Poe · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Celeste Asmar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · A40 3.0W CV1 Poe · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Herbener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-16 · NEO/Lockert/A65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen O'Hearn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · A40 3.0W CV1 Poe · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Betsey Poe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · A40 3.0W CV1 Poe · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Lozano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-16 · A55 6.0W CV1 Carmigiano · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-19 · A55 6.0W CV1 Carmigiano · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monica Lozano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-12 · A55 6.0W CV1 Carmigiano · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-12 · A55 6.0W CV1 Carmigiano · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzanne Herbener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Brian Moore / Laurie Fortune
2025-10-25 · X65 6.0 CV Oler · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Oler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
10%
1W–9L · 33.7% of games
3.5
60.9%
28W–18L · 53.1% of games
6.0
23.1%
6W–20L · 41.2% of games
6.5
39.4%
13W–20L · 46.2% of games
7.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 47% of games
7.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer