← Search

Kimberly Corbets

— year-end
59 matches · 35W–24L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Corbets to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-07-15 · A18 3.0W CRC Zidar · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pantshia Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Shoemaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · A18 3.0W CRC Zidar · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-03 · A18 3.0W CRC Zidar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Misencik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Shoemaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · A18 3.0W CRC Zidar · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Zidar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-11 · A40 3.0W CRC Tramer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kata Pagon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · A18 3.0W CRC2 Zidar · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Veronica Chopra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-03-28 · A18 3.0W CRC2 Zidar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pantshia Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-21 · A18 3.0W CRC2 Zidar · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-05 · C 5.5W CRC1 Goldsmith · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Vinocur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 62.8% of games
3.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 48.9% of games
5.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
20 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer