← Search

Joann Blair

Pekin, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 56W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joann Blair to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-08-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Connie Julien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kay Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-06 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Gregory-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Vosberg-Peoria · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Bullock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-16 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Gregory-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Bramlet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Gregory-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kay Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-09 · MSIL A40&O 3.0W Vosberg-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Sun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cheryl Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Meghan Genzel / Mary Bullock
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katie Franzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7
W
Martha Siwicke / Jane Gumm
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennie Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laurie Whitmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sue Chelikas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 48.2% of games
3.5
38.5%
15W–24L · 43.8% of games
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.8% of games
6.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 64.5% of games
6.5
14.3%
3W–18L · 37.5% of games
7.0
22.6%
7W–24L · 39.9% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 30.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
49 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova