← Search

Kimberly McHenry

Normal, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 29W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberly McHenry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-08-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Mangina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-17 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Rebholz/Dickerson-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Caslow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Mangina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-12 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Rebholz/Dickerson-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Tretter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-08 · #4 Doubles · with Patty Tobiasz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Maria Miguens / Renee Brown
2025-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Christianson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Susan Davis / Janice Zagardo
2025-07-11 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Rebholz/Dickerson-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Tobiasz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-20 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Rebholz/Dickerson-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Reckard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-13 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Rebholz/Dickerson-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Caslow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 60.5% of games
3.5
13.6%
3W–19L · 32.6% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.7% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 49% of games
6.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.9% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert