← Search

Adam Dailey

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 148W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adam Dailey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Jo.Markham40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lloyd Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-13 · Be.Koren40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Maher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · Jo.Markham40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lloyd Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-05 · Jo.Markham40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lloyd Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-02 · Ry.Lindsay18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Markham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · Sc.StJohn18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael McGuire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · Sc.StJohn18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael McGuire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Te.Sherburne18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Free mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · Te.Sherburne18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Klein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Megan Smith / Spencer Johnson
2026-06-22 · Te.Sherburne18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Free mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-16 · Sc.StJohn18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Max Stevenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · Sc.StJohn18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
83%
39W–8L · 67.8% of games
4.0
66.1%
37W–19L · 55.9% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 58.3% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.5% of games
4.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 57.6% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
39 matches
#2 Singles
12%
25 matches
#1 Singles
9%
19 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams