← Search

Davis Felts

Raleigh, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 63W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Davis Felts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-08-09 · Ke.Wolborsky18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrew Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · Ne.Day18M · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Emma Heiderscheit mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-21 · Jo.Ganeles18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Spencer Llewellyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Jo.Ganeles18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Dinicola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Jo.Ganeles18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Dinicola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · Ne.Day18M · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Beatrice Faureng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Ch.Brown18A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Waldrop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Michael Weslander / Cameron Crump
2026-05-10 · Ch.Brown18A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · TOC.Gregson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Dinicola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · Ch.Brown18A · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · TOC.Gregson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Dinicola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-23 · TOC.Gregson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connor Funk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.3% of games
4.5
33.8%
24W–47L · 45.5% of games
5.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 31.2% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
50%
13W–13L · 51.9% of games
9.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.5% of games
10.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.5% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King