← Search

Jane True

Kansas City, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 31W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane True to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-05-22 · True, Jane · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-01 · True, Jane · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Nulan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · True, Jane · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Nulan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Marne Albracht / Blair Stone
2026-02-12 · CV-Parkerson · #2 Doubles · with Linda Sollers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-11 · CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Boyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Ann Crampton / Susan Mayer
2026-02-05 · CV-Parkerson · #2 Doubles · with Edna Swart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-29 · CV-Parkerson · #4 Doubles · with Debra Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-28 · CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Boyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Elaine Shady / Barbara Johnson
2026-01-22 · CV-Parkerson · #4 Doubles · with Linda Sollers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Cindy Stoneback / Deborah Jensen
2026-01-21 · CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anita Chatigny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-15 · CV-Parkerson · #4 Doubles · with Debra Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-23 · True, Jane · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Churchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
51.9%
28W–26L · 49.8% of games
7.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 33.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 61% of the time
#3 Doubles
61%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert