← Search

Janet Peard

Lawrence, KS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 23W–41L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Janet Peard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-06-14 · Hodge, Kathy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Perkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · Kochersperger, Cindy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barb Ginavan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-21 · Hodge, Kathy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Perkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-5
L
2026-05-14 · Hodge, Kathy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · Hodge, Kathy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · Kochersperger, Cindy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Jarrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-07 · Hodge, Kathy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Cayton Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-03 · Hodge, Kathy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · Kochersperger, Cindy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Jarrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-04 · Hodge, Kathy · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-15 · Hodge, Kathy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paulette Schwerdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-01 · Hodge, Kathy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Dick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
30.4%
7W–16L · 42.9% of games
3.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 43.9% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 27.5% of games
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.1% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 49.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#2 Singles
11%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King