← Search

Amanda Billow

Longmont, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 76W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amanda Billow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
W
2026-07-19 · LTA-Q TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-16 · LTA-Q TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-02 · LTA-Q TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · LTA-Q TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-10 · LTA-Q TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-07-03 · LTA-Q TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Keenan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-26 · LTA-Q TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-05 · LAC RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Aschenbrenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-29 · LAC RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Aschenbrenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2024-05-08 · LAC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Aschenbrenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-09-07 · LTA-Q SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Britt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-08-24 · LTA-Q SILVER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Gifford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
58.1%
18W–13L · 54.9% of games
4.0
48.8%
20W–21L · 51.3% of games
7.0
50%
6W–6L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 69.5% of games
7.5mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.2% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
23 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe