← Search

Karen Hopkinson

WESTMINSTER, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 39W–28L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Karen Hopkinson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-09-03 · RCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachelle Schowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-27 · RCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meaghan Spiegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · RCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robert Diffoot mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
Miyo Park / Jennifer Peck
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Tabitha Bartel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
Lynn Adams / Brooke Babington
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Meaghan Spiegel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-06 · RCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meaghan Spiegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Meaghan Spiegel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zeke Kirkpatrick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Sean Smith / Marla Schroeder
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Steven Musick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Randall Else championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meaghan Spiegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · RCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenna Baesler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 56.5% of games
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.4% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert