← Search

Brent Bradburn

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
235 matches · 136W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brent Bradburn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history235 matches
W
2026-09-03 · The Hounds · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Flores mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-3
W
2026-08-13 · The Hounds · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kellee Bates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-01 · Miller Time · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kent Noethe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Idaho/Limbago/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · Miller Time · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · Miller Time · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · Idaho/Limbago/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · Idaho/Limbago/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · Miller Time · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · Miller Time · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Miller Time · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-27 · Miller Time · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
59%
69W–48L · 53.8% of games
4.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.1% of games
8.0
75%
12W–4L · 57.9% of games
7.5mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
50.9%
27W–26L · 50.4% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
58 matches
#1 Singles
24%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
50 matches
#2 Singles
8%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova