← Search

Steve Schneider

— year-end
13 matches · 11W–2L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Steve Schneider to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history13 matches
W
2026-06-30 · Idaho/Limbago/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Seals
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · Idaho/Limbago/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Seals
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Idaho/Limbago/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Seals
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · Idaho/Limbago/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Bradburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · Idaho/Limbago/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Bradburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Idaho/Limbago/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-05-19 · Idaho/Limbago/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kent Noethe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · Pack of Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Pack of Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-05 · Pack of Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-23 · Pack of Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kent Noethe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-21 · Pack of Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raymond Verveckken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 55.9% of games
8.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova