← Search

Linda Oberleitner

Chantilly, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 36W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Oberleitner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-07-15 · Team 16 Rapid Fire · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Trimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-6
W
2026-07-14 · Team 16 Rapid Fire · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deirdre Naughton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
W
2026-06-28 · Team 16 Rapid Fire · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Wishneff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-2
L
2026-06-25 · Team 16 Rapid Fire · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Mullin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Team 5 SuperNovas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Malloy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · Team 4 Loosely Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Loes Muller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-02 · Team 16 Rapid Fire · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-28 · Team 4 Loosely Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · Team 4 Loosely Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Trask
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-15 · Team 5 SuperNovas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Malloy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Team 4 NOVA All Stars · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John H mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · Team 5 SuperNovas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
53.8%
14W–12L · 49% of games
3.5
24.1%
7W–22L · 42.2% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 60.8% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.6% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 44.4% of games
6.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 35.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams