← Search

Linda Mullen

— year-end
117 matches · 14W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Mullen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-08-18 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Lutz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-03-12 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Dorothy Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-06 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Dorothy Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-25 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Linda Rasmuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-18 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nancy ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-09 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Linda Rasmuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-01-23 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nancy ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-14 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nancy ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-30 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sharon Downey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-08-07 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Barley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-24 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beatrix Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Teams29 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
8.3%
1W–11L · 38.5% of games
3.0
0%
0W–28L · 29.3% of games
5.0
5.9%
1W–16L · 35.4% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
22.6%
7W–24L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert